SEGAL:The Secular Evolution of GALaxies
Context: Galaxies are unique laboratories to test the universal law of gravity, the driving force from their inner cores to their outskirts. Astronomers have recently focused significant amounts of theoretical, computational and observational efforts to understand and explain their cosmic evolution. This rising interest can be explained by the alignment of three transformational shifts:
ii) Second, the steady increase in computing power allows us to perform numerical simulations of resolution and complexity greater than ever before in the context of the Cold Dark Matter (CDM) paradigm. Such a framework is now well-established and successfully describes the formation of structures on large scales, but several challenges are still present on the smaller ones. In this respect, the development of progressively more accurate numerical simulations is essential. This applies not only to isolated and idealised setups, but also to account statistically for the fluctuating environment on different scales, from galactic centers to the outskirts of dark halos. These self-gravitating astrophysical systems can therefore now be considered nested, embedded in their own lively environment, with which they interact throughout their lifetime;
Building upon the seminal works describing the linear response of self-gravitating systems (by Goldreich, Lynden-Bell, Toomre, Kalnajs and others), the development in kinetic theory of a self-consistent framework to characterise their quasi-linear response (Weinberg’01) now offers us a unique opportunity to follow galaxies over cosmic timescales. As for the Earth, galaxies are indeed subject to ‘weather’ and ‘climate’. The former is driven by transients (which reflect recent disturbances which have not yet phase mixed), while the latter encodes distinctive features specifically in orbital space generated over long (secular) timescales. Quasi-linear theory captures the latter. It is, therefore, ideally suited to describe galaxies on large and small scales, because their dynamical times are very short compared to a Hubble time. For galaxies, the most significant (non serendipitous) processes are secular in nature. This motivates the present proposal: through the corresponding stochastic differential equations (SDE), galactic dynamics can now make statistical predictions over cosmic times.
For instance, in stellar discs, we must investigate the relative diffusive efficiency of shot noise triggered by Giant Molecular Clouds (GMCs), clumps within the halo, central bars, etc. We must also quantify external sources of fluctuations: flybys, infall etc. We must finally pay attention to the system’s initial reservoir of free energy, which differs greatly between, e.g. spirals and ellipticals, and to the secular transformation of the underlying equilibria through infall. Once all these mechanisms are statistically characterised and quantified, long-term implications (e.g. for the age-dispersion relations within discs, the impact of bars) can be compared to detailed observations, e.g. of the structure of the Milky Way’s distribution function (DF), provided by Gaia (e.g. through structures in the U-V plane). The system’s DF may involve additional parameters (in so-called extended phase space), such as stellar metallicity, which traces the interplay between dynamics and chemistry (abundances, alpha-enhanced elements, etc, which are indirect proxies for stellar age). Hence one also needs to account for cold gas inflow and the birth (and possibly death) of stars, i.e. for the possibility of sources and sinks of particles. We must finally follow multiple masses and describe the corresponding secularly induced mass segregation. This is essential near the Galaxy’s massive black hole (MBH), but more generally of interest in the context of stellar discs, and even galactic halos, where substructures within the halo act as an effective varying number of massive quasi-particles. All these scales have in common that gravity and resonances drive their secular evolution.
Hence a novel single framework can explain the long-term behaviour of various components of galaxies, seemingly different as they involve nested scales, but in reality, describable through the same approach. SEGAL will quantify the cosmic fate of these self-gravitating systems over a Hubble time and identify asymptotic solutions, specific to each scale. SEGAL will study the statistical impact of e.g. stellar migration, disc thickening via giant molecular clouds and spiral waves, resonant relaxation in galactic centers, bars and globular clusters, or the reshuffling of the orbital structure of dark halo cores. This is both unprecedented and extremely useful.
Building up on the practical advantage of quasi-linear theories capturing the long-term effect of self-gravity in an open multi-scale environment, we must proceed via the following computationally-demanding steps:
B.1: quantify the environmental effects induced by the larger scale using ensemble of simulations; compute the relevant power spectra driving externally induced fluctuations at each scale;
B.2: implement both secular formalisms, solving for the joint kinetic equations and quantifying each characteristic timescale, while accounting for the difference in temperature and degeneracies specific to each scale; identify the generic asymptotic solutions (resp. core halos, exponential discs, cusps...);
B.3: cast our results in terms of observables, tailored to existing and future facilities, and propose new observational diagnostics to test our theoretical predictions.
B.1 Quantifying the fluctuating environment: We will rely on SEGAL’s computing resources to produce sets of simulations to account statistically for the specific fluctuating environment on the boundary of that scale, from galactic centers to the outskirts of dark halos, so that the inner boundary of each outer-scale corresponds to the environment of its inner-scale. The assumption will be that while the detailed long-term results of N-body or hydrodynamical simulations should be considered with the appropriate level of skepticism, their short-term ensemble-averaged behaviour on the larger scales are more robust. Within SEGAL we will focus only on canonical angular power spectra (involving the Fourier transform of the potential fluctuations w.r.t. the angle coordinates conjugated to the actions – labeling orbits), since the fluctuation-dissipation theorem tells us they are the relevant quantity. We will use multi-scale, zoomed-in simulations that include massive black holes, stellar and AGN feedback in the spirit of New-Horizon. We pioneered such measurements using over 15 000 dark halos at the Virial radius in Aubert+’07, over 50,000 and 200,000 virtual galaxies, in Pichon+’11 and Dubois+’14, see Figure 0, 5, 7 & 8. The fluctuation dissipation theorem provides us with a shortcut: from the point of view of the underlying orbital structure, only the power spectrum of fluctuations matters. This is a significant compression of the full statistics! We will rely on zoom on multiple resolutions in order to fit and extrapolate these power spectra. These fits will be deliverables of the project and made available to the community. We will also compute explicitly the ensemble average over sets of galaxies of the rate of change of actions which enter the quasi-linear diffusion equations as fluxes.
B.3 Compute observables for upcoming surveys: Today, the synergy of telescopes and spacecrafts at different wavelengths allows us to study galaxies, and embedded MBHs at unprecedented resolution. Gaia, MANGA, SAMI, the VLT with Gravity, are all online and fully working. On longer timescales, following the first detection of gravitational waves by LIGO in 2015, upcoming instruments like LISA will measure the rate at which massive black holes in galactic centers swallow stars and spin up. JWST, DESI, LSST, Euclid, 4MOST, and MOONS will soon provide a comprehensive view of galaxies and their MBH hosts. All our results (the DFs) must therefore be cast in terms of direct observables, tailored to these existing and future facilities, in order to interpret such datasets (see e.g. Figure 2 bottom panel from Fouvry+’16, or Figure 4 from Fouvry+’18). These observables are typically marginals of the underlying DF(J,τ) and are therefore ‘straightforwardly’ computed. For instance, the so-called Hercules streams in Hipparcos and Gaia data are likely to be kinematic moments of this secular distribution function. Depending on scale, the signatures of our stochastic solutions will be quantified in terms of the evolution of the age-dispersion relations in the Milky Way’s disc, its vertical gradient, and the stellar dynamical evolution of the Galactic center’s cluster (as a probe of e.g. black hole spin). It will also be applied on larger scales to investigate the cusp-core problem of dark matter, the persistence of streams within dark halos.
On each scale, we will quantify the
environment, integrate the stochastic differential equations, validate
the result using alternative integrators (Nbody, Vlasov, FEM), identify
asymptotic solutions and derive observables from the knowledge of the
expectation of the phase-averaged time dependent distribution function.
B.4 Scientific themes: SEGAL is focused on three scientific themes, on nested physical scales, embedded in a fourth transverse unifying theme:
Secular-C: probing the vicinity of supermassive black holes in a Hubble time;
Secular-H: restructuring life and open halos and their globular cluster population,
Secular-C: the vicinity of MBHs in a Hubble time(GP,FV,JBF,MV,EV,JM,PDF)
Results & Deliverables: Characteristic timescale for each diffusion process; Detailed computations of the relaxation timescales in the whole orbital space surrounding SgrA* for scalar resonant relaxation, vector resonant relaxation, non-resonant relaxation. All shared as a publicly available code. Prediction of the EMRI rate as a function of a stellar cluster's properties (e.g. density power law index and mass spectrum). Computation of the MBH mass and spin growth as sourced by the relaxation of the stellar cluster. Comparison of the statistical distribution of observed stellar properties in SgrA* (e.g. eccentricity or density distribution) w.r.t. the expectations from the relaxation processes. Quantitative estimation of the dissolution time of stellar discs in the vicinity of SgrA* and comparison with the observed discs. Constraints on the efficiency of mass segregation (e.g. between stars and intermediate mass black holes) from observations and theoretical expectations.
Secular-D: the cosmic fate of galactic discs (JBF,CP,BF,YD,AH,MW,AS,DA,GM,SP,JD,AS,PDF)
Spiral arms in the gas distribution also provide another source of fluctuations, while the central bar of the disc offers yet another coherent stimuli. The history of galactic discs likely comprises the joint responses to all these various stimuli (internal and external). One can find in the solar neighbourhood at least three illustrations of such effects. First, the random velocity of each coeval cohort of stars increases with the cohort’s age (Wielen,’77; Aumer+’09). In addition, the velocity distribution around the Sun exhibits several ‘streams’ of stars (Dehnen,’98). Each of these streams contains stars of various ages and chemistries, which are all responding to some stimulus in a similar fashion (Famaey+’05). Finally, in the two-dimensional action-space, resonant ridges form and play an important role in the secular dynamics of razor-thin stellar discs, as argued in Sellwood+’14. Indeed, Gaia’DR2 has revealed a very rich structure in local velocity space, which is related to resonances with multiple non-axisymmetric patterns (including the bar) and possibly to incomplete phase-mixing. In terms of in-plane motions, this rich structure is also seen as ridges in the actions of the axisymmetric background potential of the Galaxy. We have preliminary shown (Monari+’19) that a second prominent ridge in action space then corresponds to the 4:1 outer resonance of the m = 4 mode of such a bar, and that the velocity structure seen as an arch at high azimuthal velocities in Gaia data can be related to its 2:1 outer Lindblad resonance. Direct numerical simulations of thin stellar discs over secular timescales are very challenging because their two dimensional geometry combined with their responsiveness causes discreteness noise to be important unless very large number of particles is employed. It is only recently that it became possible to simulate a disc with a sufficient number of particles for Poisson shot noise to be dynamically unimportant for many orbital times. A complementary approach to understand their dynamics is therefore to rely on extended kinetic theory via a stochastic framework. This will be the topic of this WP, relying on in WPT2 for validation. SEGAL will follow up on Fouvry+’15 and evolve both kinetic equations in this context, accounting for mass and angular momentum inflow within the disc, and modeling self-consistently churning (drift in guiding center) and blurring (heating) over a Hubble time, while accounting for secular cold gas infall from the large-scale-structure environment (Pichon+’11, Kimm+’11), see WPH2. A realistic radial profile of accreted cold gas is a requirement for the chemo-dynamical modelling of the Milky Way.
WPD2: Galactic disc thickening/settling The problem of explaining the origin of thick discs in our Galaxy has been around for some time (e.g. Gilmore+’83). The interest for this dynamical question has been revived recently in the light of the APOGEE survey (Eisenstein+’11) and Gaia data. Star formation within stellar discs typically occurs on the circular orbits of the gas, so that young stars should form a very thin disc (Wielen’77). However, chemo-kinematic observations of old stars within our Milky Way (Jurić+’08; Bovy+’12) or in other galactic discs (Burstein’79; Comerón+’11) have all shown that thick components are very common. Yet the formation of thickened stellar discs remains a significant puzzle for galactic formation theory. Various dynamical mechanisms, either internal or external, have been proposed to explain the observed thickening, but their respective impacts and roles remain to be quantified. First, some violent major events could be at the origin of the vertically extended distribution of stars in disc galaxies: accretion of galaxy satellites (Meza+’05; Abadi+’03), major mergers of gas-rich systems (Brook+’04), or even gravitational instabilities in gas-rich turbulent clumpy discs (Noguchi’98). Violent mergers definitely have a strong impact on galactic structure, but thickened stellar discs could also originate from the slow and continuous heating of pre-existing thin discs, via for example galactic infall leading to multiple minor mergers (Toth+’92; Villalobos+’08). Spiral density waves (Sellwood+’84; Monari+’16) are also possible candidates to increase the disc's velocity dispersion, which can be converted into vertical motion through deflections from giant molecular clouds (GMCs) (Spitzer+’53; Hänninen+’02). In addition, radial migration could also play an important role in the secular evolution of stellar discs. This migration could be induced by spiral-bar coupling (Minchev+’10), transient spiral structures (Barbanis+’67; Solway+’12), or perturbations induced by minor mergers (Bird+’12). Finally, recent large numerical simulations are now attempted in a self-consistent cosmological setup (Grand+’16), to probe the interplay between these competing mechanisms (Fig. 5). All investigations can be broadly characterised as induced by an external or internal source of fluctuations to trigger a vertical orbital reshuffling in the disc. SEGAL will quantify in WPD2 the expected cosmic evolution of the vertical structure of the disc and its population, relying on the multi-component generality of the kinetic formalism. This will involve building perturbatively thickened equilibria with a mapping in action-space from an integrable to a non-integrable model via fits of generating functions (Kaasalainen+’94, see WPT1 below). We will then solve the exact field equations, construct an appropriate basis of potentials, and deal with the full response matrix in order to solve for the corresponding Balescu-Lenard and Fokker Planck equations. Validation will be done in WPT2. We will finally derive the corresponding global kinetic observables: age-vertical dispersion gradients and 3D velocity ellipsoid as a function of position and cosmic age and population, etc.
WPD3: Galactic bar buckling/ dissolution Gaia data viewed in action-space is, as predicted, fairly structured in the solar neighbourhood (see Fig 2). Some of these ridges are possibly transients, while others are of secular nature (Fig. 4). For instance, the impact of the recurrent Galactic bar falls within the formalism of resonant relaxation captured by the Fokker Planck and possibly the Balescu-Lenard equa-tions. In connection with WPT1 and our recent work on IBL for the Hamiltonian mean field model (Benetti+’17, Artemyev+’18), an abstraction for resonances near a bar, we will study how collisional-driven separatrix crossing can explain dissolution and/or buckling (Antoja+’18, Khoperskov+’01). It would be of interest to revisit – in the context of kinetic theory –Binney+19, who relied on an ‘impulse approximation’ while neglecting the self-gravity of the disc, possibly missing the partly self-sustained vertical perturbation present up to 3 Gyr after bar buckling (Khoperskov+’18).
Results & Deliverables: Computations of the timescale for disc thickening, while accounting for self-gravity, as induced by, e.g. DM halo fluctuations, GMCs, passing-by satellites. Computations of the diffusion coefficients in orbital space for churning (diffusion in angular momentum) and blurring (diffusion in eccentricity), while accounting for self-gravity, as induced by different heating mechanisms, e.g. bars, spiral arms, GMCs, passing-by satellites, and DM halo fluctuations. Characterisation of diffusion in extended phase space, i.e. accounting for metallicity and age, and the respective signatures associated with the different heating sources. Global asymptotic and steady-state solution for exponential discs. Characterisation of the orbital diffusion signatures in the vicinity of the Sun, as traced by GAIA DR2 via marginals of DF(J,τ) and the corresponding kinetic estimators. Theory for bar dissolution and buckling. Self-consistent model for cosmic disc settling.
Secular-H: Secular evolution: restructuring live and open halos (JBF,CP,ALV,SR,PB,MW,PDF)
WPH3: The phase space structure of tidal streams and their progenitor clusters.The stellar streams within our MW’s dark halo as seen by GAIA will be analysed in terms of an impulsive diffusion process which will allow us to constrain the dark halo’s shape, its flattening and its clumpiness, (since each stream provides an estimate of the local diffusion tensor, which in turn scales like the local power-spectrum of the (dark+visible) potential). All quantities are of interest to constrain the ΛCDM paradigm on Galactic scales. One additional goal will be investigate the subtle connection between the structural and kinematic properties of the stars in the tidal tails and the phase space properties of the progenitor star clusters (Varri+ '18). It has important implications on the morphology and dynamics of the streams, as recently demonstrated by the complex outer structures of the globular cluster omega Centari, for which the modelling of the internal rotation has been crucial (Ibata+ '19, Nature). A key aspect will be the continuation of our current investigation of the fundamental role played by 'kinematic complexity' in the evolution of collisional stellar systems (Breen+ '17, 19, Rozier+ '19, Hamilton+ '19.
Results & Deliverables: Measurement of the power-spectrum of the potential fluctuations induced by the supernova feedback from a galactic disc, as a function of a galaxy's properties (e.g. SFR or radial profile). Implementation of the diffusion equation to constrain the timescale for the cusp-core transformation from inner baryonic perturbations, as a function of a halo's properties (e.g. mass or concentration). Measurement of the power-spectrum of fluctuations induced by a DM halo, as a function of a halo's properties (e.g. cold DM vs. fuzzy DM, role of the large-scale structures). Computation of the galactic disc heating induced by the DM halo perturbations. Formulation of a theory of angular momentum diffusion in collisional stellar systems. Characterization of the phase space properties of tidal streams resulting from progenitor clusters modelled with direct summation N-body simulations, including rotation and pressure anisotropy. Computation of the dissolution time of stellar streams from DM halo perturbations, and comparisons with constraints from GAIA measurements. Construction of a theory of inflow-driven diffusion to account for the statistics of inflows on galactic scales.
Secular-T: Secular theory for self-gravitating systems (PHC,BM,FB,SP,CS, PDF, JBF,CP)
WPT1: At first order, in the previous themes, we assumed integrability, i.e. the existence of global angle-action coordinates. It can be either guaranteed by the system’s symmetry (spherical halo, razor-thin discs) or by additional assumptions, such as the epicyclic approximation. When it does not hold, the system’s dynamics may become partially chaotic and its secular evolution may need to be described via explicit stochastic diffusions, which we will need to calibrate from simulations. For example, for stellar discs, chaos is likely to play a role in the central bar. In SEGAL, we will rely on perturbation theory (Goldstein’50) to build new (fast and slow) angle-actions customized to each resonance, using as a perturbation the departure from symmetry of the sought system: this strategy, known as Torus Mapping (Binney+’16), yields new actions with which secular diffusion will be reformulated. We will in particular build secular diffusion equations for thickened discs models and triaxial cusps. Eventually, it would be of significant interest to account for the anisotropy of the environment as well (following e.g. Aubert+’04).
WPT2: When implementing complex kinetic theories with loopback via self-gravity, validation is essential. Since we aim to make SDE solution a competitive tool to N-body simulations, we must demonstrate that the kinetic formulation accurately describes the secular response of modelled systems. Relying on ColDICE, a state-of-the-art public Vlasov (waterbag) solver developed at IAP (via our Vlasix project), we will compare the effect of secular evolution accurately described by such codes to the prediction of N-body on the one hand, and kinetic theory using SDE on the other hand. We will also rely on FEM for comparison, relying on the (hired) expertise of the PDF, and the PI and CoI upcoming investment in this technology (using the discontinuous Galerkin method). This comparison will also be used to study and understand the process of entropy production, having access via kinetic theory to an explicit analytic expression for its rate. It will allow us to study secular dynamical phase transitions (Fouvry+’15), which capture the slow and irreversible build-up of collisional effects leading to a destabilisation of secularly metastable states. At the technical level, the IBL equation can be used to quantify numerical shot-noise errors occurring in N-body codes, and partially controled in Vlasov codes such as ColDICE. Conversely, ColDICE can be used to study coherent transients in phase space, as seen by GAIA.
WPT3 The derivation of the existing resonant orbital kinetic equations assumes full phase-average. They do not in their present form capture commensurability in the orbital frequencies (such as the 2:3 Pluto–Neptune resonances in our solar system) and are only concerned with orbit-orbit interactions. We will investigate in SEGAL how the secular formalism can be generalized to include such mean-motion resonances, following the procedure implemented for the Keplerian problem (i.e. integration over the fast angle before closure). SEGAL will also investigate how kinetic theory can be generalized to systems with a small or fluctuating number of effective particles, for example as a result of the progressive dissolution of over-densities. This will allow us to explore intermediate timescales, when the system has not fully phase mixed nor violently relaxed. We will attempt to develop a theory for the rate of entropy production, while distinguishing the rapidly rising phase from the asymptotic one.
|
WPT4 In some
regimes, the resonant orbital diffusion described by the IBL equation
may vanish or weaken significantly. This can for example occur in
galactic centers, as illustrated by the Schwarzschild barrier, driven by
the divergence of the relativistic precession frequencies as stars move
closer to the BH. This vanishing can also be imposed by symmetry, e.g.
the collision operator vanishes for 1D homogeneous systems. Finally, it
may happen on longer secular timescales if steady states for the IBL
equation have been reached by the system. In such regimes, additional collisional
effects involving three-body resonances will be accounted for within
SEGAL. In addition to strong collisions, resonant effects associated
with 1/N2 correlations
can also drive the dynamics. This requires to consider the third
equation of the BBGKY hierarchy and focus on slower effects associated
with 3−body correlations. SEGAL will generalise the functional
derivation of the inhomogeneous Landau equation (Fouvry+’16a) to account
for collective effects and re-derive the IBL equation. This derivation
will be challenging, as it involves a Fredholm integral equation for
closure, but it is potentially very useful, since path integrals can
easily be tailored to variational principles, which should help us
formalise optimal FEM solutions. SEGAL will also apply this method to
derive a closed kinetic equation involving higher order correlations.
This could for example allow us to describe the dynamics of 1D
homogeneous systems, for which the 1/N IBL collision term vanishes by
symmetry (Eldridge+’63). It is also relevant for the Hamiltonian Mean
Field toy model (HMF) (Bouchet +’05), the archetype of bar instability
in galaxies. Finally, kinetic equations such as the Balescu equation
describe the most probable evolution of the one particle distribution
function through the law of large numbers. Following recent developments
in non-equilibrium statistical mechanics, we will attempt to describe
rare-event fluctuations away from this most likely PDF using Large
Deviation Theory (e.g. Saint-Raymond’09, Codis+’15).
Results & Deliverables: Extension of the kinetic theory to account for higher-order correlations, e.g. as needed in the homogeneous HMF model. Extension of the kinetic theory to account for mean-motion resonances in quasi-Keplerian systems (in galactic nuclei and proto-planetary systems), i.e. going beyond the uncorrelated double Keplerian orbit-average. Extension of the kinetic theory to account for non-resonant effects, e.g. as in the diffusion à la Chandrasekhar through local Keplerian deflections. Exploration of non-integrable geometries (e.g. thickened discs, flattened spheres, and barred discs) to account for the richness of orbits and possible chaotic diffusion. Development of a numerical solver and integrator for the linear response theory of self-gravitating systems and the associated Balescu-Lenard kinetic equation. Validation of the kinetic theory through detailed comparisons with other approaches, in particular using Vlasov solver, direct N-body methods, and FEM methods.
Quantitative assessment of success: A measure of the impact of this programme – beyond our detailed secular understanding of galactic evolution, black-hole and dark-halo physics – will be i) a statistical understanding of multi-scale galactic evolution over half a Hubble time ii) the computation of the typical diffusion time of each secular process and the identification of the asymptotic solutions, and iii) the promotion of quasi-linear theories as a general universal and powerful means to rival/complement brute force Monte Carlo (N-body) methods. While N-body simulations have been extremely successful in experimentally improving our understanding of galaxy dynamics, they would still definitely benefit from validation through independent methods. This programme aims to do this via analytical and intensive numerical work of an intrinsically novel nature, by solving the corresponding SDEs and seeking finite element methods solutions. At the technical level, SEGAL’s deliverables will include new public routines for solving extended kinetic equations as stochastic Langevin processes, or using finite element methods (following our online distribution of codes such as MatrixMethod or MPgrafic and simulations outputs such as horizon-skymap). SEGAL will also deliver asymptotic solutions on all three scales, sets of estimators for standard observables, a better understanding of the effect of orbital resonances, and an extension of kinetic theory to closures involving three body encounters or more.
Feasibility: SEGAL is an exploratory, innovative and challenging project: it involves novel theoretical and numerical developments, addressing key questions in long term galactic evolution which have proven to be difficult. We are nevertheless confident that stochastic methods will allow us to understand the long term evolution of galaxies which will complement – or indeed in some context rival the classical N-body methods. Indeed we have already demonstrated via a series of forerunner papers that we control all the expertise required to carry out the programme presented in this proposal. This includes i) full scientific leadership on these truly original, unexplored and timely techniques; ii) managerial skills in supervising and training half a dozen PhD students around this topic. Several of them (Aubert, Ocvick, Dubois) are indeed now world-leaders in the production of massive state-of-the-art numerical simulations; others have received numerous prizes for the secular work; iii) having pioneered the statistical description of the cosmic environment of halos, first as dark matter flows (e.g. Aubert+’04), then as baryonic flows (e.g. Kimm+’11, Welker et al 15a,b); iv) having computed for the first time the exact drift and diffusion coefficient of the Balescu-Lenard equation and the corresponding diffusion time (Fouvry+‘15,17,Hamilton+’18); and v) having convinced the highly competitive (with pressure factors of 12) French ANR research council to fund at a level of 0.5 M€ the precursor (cosmic scale) project, ‘The origin of the Hubble sequence’, which has proven very successful (> 80 rank A publications) and has led to the intensive numerical (Dubois+‘14,17) and analytical (Fouvry+‘15a-c,16,17) work that makes this proposal possible (see the end of project report).
Risk assessment and mitigation: Since most work-packages are independent, we do not expect any significant stumbling blocks. Extended kinetic theory has already proven effective in explaining the origin of ridges in disc, the MW and clusters, and the behaviour of stars near our Galaxy’s massive black hole. A transverse work-package Secular-T is devoted to quality assessment using a comparison with existing Vlasov/N-body/FEM solvers. Having matured this research over the last ten years, and successfully implemented three existing case of flux estimation, we envisage further improvement (e.g. going beyond the assumed integrability of the underlying system, or accounting for the effect of possible overlapping resonances). Each of these upgrades will be addressed explicitly within the unifying theme Secular-T. In the most unlikely event that secular kinetic diffusion evolution (via both SDE and FEM) would turn out to be too time demanding within one of the work-packages, we would resort to the other packages, to direct estimates of diffusion fluxes using Vlasov and N-body approach. Finally, within Secular-T we will also carry out more exploratory research which will only impact the rest of the project as a bonus. We therefore anticipate that the resources requested will allow us to carry out SEGAL’s most of this programme within four years, and possibly exceed our target.
SEGAL involves four complementary nodes led respectively by C. Pichon (Paris), P.H. Chavanis (Toulouse), B. Marcos (Nice), and B. Famaey (Strasbourg). Each node’s personnel is supplemented by external collaborators (mostly from the UK) which will contribute to the project as a whole, and to the scientific aims of that group. This structure provides the consortium with effective theoretical and observational expertise rooted in astrophysics and kinetic theory, as demonstrated in our recent (>20) joint publications which pioneered this field. Marcos’ group will bring his expertise in kinetic equations in the context of statistical physics and exactly solvable models, as well as expertise in modeling numerically progentiors of the MW, Famaey’s on modeling the chemo-dynamical evolution of the Milky Way with the Gaia data. Chavanis’ group will continue to provide a theoretical understanding of kinetic theory, while Pichon’s will focus on data in the vicinity of Sgr A*, and acquiring knowledge in SDE and FEM methods. The expected synergies between the four nodes will be key to reaching the milestones of the project. The PDF will allow us to bridge the four institutes through joint work, spending two years in Paris and one in Strasbourg. (S)he will also provide new expertise in FEM and relativistic simulations. As a group, we aim to carry out the programme presented in this proposal via re-enforced collaboration funded by the ANR, and shared computed resources hosted by IAP.
Given the expected close collaboration
between the various nodes, we now describe our requested resources
globally. The main emphasis of the budget of this ANR project is indeed
on promoting such collaboration between the nodes, which has proven very
effective for our past
ANR (during which we organized 3
international meeting and 6 internal collaborative meetings). Hence a
significant fraction of the budget will once again be devoted to
travel/visitor costs.
The
PI’s group activity has focused on gravitational dynamics,
with a special emphasis on the statistical
characterisation of matter. They have in
particular analysed the instability and secular mechanisms driving the
evolution of galaxies embedded in their cosmic environment. This
investigation has led them to explore the dynamics of the large-scale
structure, the intergalactic and interstellar media and the secular
dynamics of galaxies and black holes. They have promoted novel tools
and theories to trace and understand the impact of the cosmic web in
simulations and observations. They used state-of-the-art
“full-physics” cosmological simulations (Marenostrum’07, Horizon’08,
Horizon-AGN’14, New Horizon’18), theoretical priors (tidal torque,
excursion set…), and surveys (COSMOS, VIPERS, SDSS) to disentangle the
relative effects of all these interconnected influences, to understand
the acquisition of angular momentum driving the morphology of
galaxies. One of the highlights of their work is a complete theory for
conditional spin alignment (see Codis+’12,15, Laigle+’15), conditional
assembly bias (Musso+17’, Kraljic+18’) and cosmic web connectivity
(Codis+18’).
They have also worked
on smaller scales
on the secular evolution of stellar systems driven by discreteness and
their cosmic environment. They investigated analytically
the secular transformation of cusps into cores, radial migration,
Galactic center and globular cluster dynamics (including rotation) and
disc thickening driven by GMCs, relying on breakthroughs in kinetic
theory. It reflects their recurrent focus on statistical
approaches – which have been the successful backbone of large-scale
structure cosmology – promoted to galactic
scales, in order to follow galactic evolution
over cosmic time. The astrophysical motivation is Galactic
archeology/near field cosmology: to use the chemo-dynamical
information encoded in extended phase space to time-reverse the
history of galaxies and their host black holes and constrain dark
matter. It is also of physical and formal interest, as the archetype
of a stochastic anisotropic process with positive feedback loops. Two
of their outstanding contributions have been i) accounting for the
secular evolution of open systems (Pichon+’06) and ii) implementing
the Balescu-Lenard equation to stellar systems for the first time
(Fouvry+’15), and in the process demonstrating why
swing-amplified sequences need not be correlated to account for the
formation of ridges in action space, now observed in details by GAIA.
The PI has a proven track record of leading large scientific projects
– such as ANR
spin(e), involving training and
supervising many PhDs and postdocs, and successfully promoting
collaborations amongst scientists across different institutions (Oxford,
Marseille, Lyon, Seoul, Edinburgh). Halle brings numerical expertise in
secular galactic processes while Volonteri on BH physics. Weinberg
pioneered this field of research. Perrin’s group first hand knowledge of
Sgr A* will contribute
to the project with new astrometric points for S2 and new constraints on
orbital elements. They will fit the data with the GYOTO ray tracing code
and perform a new test of GR: the pericenter shift. The test will also
comprise the search for a possible extended mass around the black hole.
Bernardeau and Prunet’s in depth expertise in gravitational theory will
complement the recent hiring of Fouvry at CNRS, which will prove
critical to the success of this ANR.
Understanding the long-term evolution of the components of galaxies such as stellar discs and galactic centers is now a subject of intensive research. In this context, the purpose of SEGAL is to establish quasi-linear theory as an ideal tool and enlightening addition to N-body simulations to probe statistically the cosmic fate of galaxies on multiple scales over a good fraction of a Hubble time. With the present public release of the GAIA data, a detailed theoretical modelling of the-long term evolution of the Milky Way’s internal structure is in order. Quasi-linear theory is for instance ideally suited to explain the novel observed features in the phase-space of our Milky Way. The cross-validation of N-body simulations via kinetic theory on secular timescales is now also of prime importance for upcoming projects like DESI, LSST, Euclid, 4MOST, MOONS etc, which rely heavily on modeling the dynamics of galaxies to mock their surveys. Eventually we will be able to gauge the roles of nature vs. nurture in establishing the observed properties of galaxy population on small and large scales, something currently out of reach of standard N-body techniques. Finally, the universal nature of gravitational kinetic theory could eventually allow us to address related problems, such as the secular evolution of proto-planetary discs. More generally, gravity, with its rich phenomenology, is ideally suited to help us understand in detail the secular implications of collective modes, shot noise and resonances. As such, it will continue to enlighten our understanding of the underlying mathematics, capturing fundamental physical processes such as entropy production, anisotropic resonant diffusion, secular phase transition etc. Hence gravitational kinetic theory will also stimulate progress and innovative research in theoretical physics and beyond. Following our past distribution of existing codes (e.g. MatrixMethod, MPgrafic, or simulations results like horizon-simulation.org and projet-horizon.fr) all our deliverables will be made available online on the public page of SEGAL for dissemination and validation to maximize impact. In essence, this area of research will, therefore, thrive in the coming years, as the communities active in cosmology and formation and dynamics of galaxies and star clusters are already converging towards a common set of open questions and challenges, and have much to learn from one another. SEGAL has the ambition to tackle exactly this - mostly unexplored - scientific intersection. Such a spirit, coupled with the novelty of the proposed methodology, generates great potential for discovery. The ultimate outcome of this unique synergy will be a deeper understanding of the fundamental physical processes in the assembly of cosmic structures in our universe and the proposed programme will contribute significantly to this endeavour.
Summary table of persons involved in the project: the colour code reflect WP
Partner |
Name |
First name |
position |
Role & responsibilities |
Involvement |
Pichon |
Christophe |
DR2 |
Coordinator |
||
Famaey |
Benoit |
DR2 |
Strasbourg scientific lead |
18p.month |
|
Toulouse |
Chavanis |
Pierre-Henri |
DR2 |
Toulouse scientific lead |
24p.month |
Nice |
Marcos |
Bruno |
MdC |
Nice scientific lead |
20p.month |
IAP |
Dubois |
Yohan |
CR1 |
Hydrodynamical simulations |
12p.month |
IAP |
Rozier |
Simon |
PhD |
Linear response |
|
IAP |
Bernardeau |
Francis |
DR1 |
Statistical physics |
6p.month |
IAP |
Fouvry |
Jean-Baptiste |
CR |
Secular theory |
48p.month |
IAP |
Volonteri |
Marta |
DR1 |
BH physics |
12p.month |
Rouberol |
Stephane |
IR |
System manager |
24p.month |
|
IAP/Obs |
Perrin |
Guy |
Astronomer |
Co-I Gravity |
6p.month |
IAP/Obs |
Paumard |
Thibaut |
CR1 |
GC dynamics |
12p.month |
Vincent |
Frederic |
CR1 |
BH dynamics |
12p.month |
|
IAP/Obs |
Halle |
Anaëlle |
Postdoc |
Disc secular evolution |
20p.month |
IAP/UMass |
Weinberg |
Martin |
Professor |
Secular evolution |
12p.month |
IAP/CFHT |
Prunet |
Simon |
CR1 |
Linear response theory |
24p.month |
IAP/Strasbourg |
Postdoc |
Postdoc |
Postdoc |
Secular evolution/FEM |
36p.month |
Siebert |
Arnaud |
Astronomer |
GAIA dynamical modelling |
16p.month |
|
Aubert |
Dominique |
Professor |
Secular theory/Simulations |
14p.month |
|
Strasbourg/AIP |
Monari |
Postdoc |
Secular theory/Simulations |
24p.month |
|
Strasbourg/IOA |
Eugene |
Postdoc |
GAIA/Nuclear cluster |
24p.month |
|
Sire |
Clement |
DR1 |
Hamiltonian systems |
12p.month |
|
Toulouse/ROE |
Varri |
Anna Lisa |
Professor |
Stellar dynamics |
24p.month |
Toulouse/ROE |
Breen |
Phil |
Postdoc |
Nbody simulations |
36p.month |
Nice |
Peirani |
Sebastien |
CR1 |
Galactic dynamics |
24p.month |
Nice/Oxford |
Devriendt |
Julien |
Professor |
Galactic evolution |
12p.month |
Nice/Oxford |
Slyz |
Adrianne |
Hydrodynamics |
12p.month |
|
Nice/Oxford |
Magorrian |
John |
Professor |
Nuclear cluster dynamics |
12p.month |
Alexander, T. 2005, Phys. Rep., 419, 65
Aubert, D., & Pichon, C. 2007, MNRAS, 374,
877
Aumer, M., & Binney, J. J. 2009, MNRAS,
397, 1286
Balescu, R. 1960, Physics of Fluids, 3, 52
Bar-Or, B., & Alexander, T. 2014, Class. Quantum Grav., 31, 244003
Bar-Or, B., Fouvry, J.-B., 2018, ApJ, 860, 23
Bar-Or, B., Fouvry, J.-B., Tremaine, S., 2018, APJ
Binney, J., & Lacey, C. 1988, MNRAS, 230,
597
Binney, J., & McMillan, P. J. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 1982
Binney, J., & Schönrich, S. 2019, MNRAS, 481, 1501
Bouchet, F., & Dauxois, T. 2005, Phys. Rev. E, 72, 045103
Bovy, J., Rix, H.-W., Liu, C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 753, 148
Breen, P.G., Varri A.L., Heggie, D.C. 2017
MNRAS 471, 2778
Brook, C. B., Kawata, D., Gibson, B. K.,
& Freeman, K. C. 2004, ApJ, 612, 894
Burstein, D. 1979, ApJ, 234, 829
Chandrasekhar, S. 1949, Rev. Mod. Phys., 21, 383
Chavanis, P.-H. 2002, Dynamics of systems with
long range interactions
—. 2010, J. Stat. Mech., 5, 19
—. 2012a, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 127, 19
—. 2012b, Physica A, 391, 3680
—. 2012c, Physica A, 391, 3657
—. 2012d, J. Stat. Mech. Theor. Exp., 2, 02019
—. 2013a, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 128, 126
—. 2013b, A&A, 556, A93
Dehnen, W. 1998, AJ, 115, 2384
Dubinski, J., & Carlberg, R. G. 1991, ApJ, 378, 496
Dubois, Y., Peirani, S., Pichon, C., et al.
2016, ArXiv, arXiv:1606.03086
Dubois, Y., Pichon, C., Welker, C., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 1453
Eisenstein, D. J., Weinberg, D. H., Agol, E., et al. 2011, AJ, 142, 72
El-Zant, A., Shlosman, I., & Hoffman, Y.
2001, ApJ, 560, 636
Famaey, B., Jorissen, A., Luri, X., et al.
2005, A&A, 430, 165
Fouvry, J.-B., Binney, J., & Pichon, C. 2015a, ApJ, 806, 117
Fouvry, J.-B., Chavanis, P.-H., & Pichon, C. 2016a, Physica A,
459, 117
—. 2016b, Physics Letters A, 380, 2589
Fouvry, J.-B., & Pichon, C. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 1982
Fouvry, J.-B., Pichon, C., & Chavanis, P.-H. 2015b, A&A, 581,
A139
Fouvry, J.-B., Pichon, C., Chavanis, P.-H., & Monk, L. 2016c,
MNRAS,
Fouvry, J.-B., Pichon, C., Magorrian, J., & Chavanis, P.-H. 2015c,
A&A, 584
Fouvry, J.-B., Pichon, C., & Prunet, S. 2015d, MNRAS, 449, 1967
Fouvry, J.-B., Pichon, C., Chavanis, P.-H., Monk, L., 2017, MNRAS,
471, 2642
Fouvry, J.-B., Pichon, C., Magorrian, J., 2016, AA, 598, A71
Fouvry, J.-B., Pichon, C., Chavanis, P.-H., 2017, A&A, 609, A38
Fouvry, J.-B., Chavanis, P.-H., Pichon, C., 2016, Physics Letters A,
380, 2589
Fouvry, J.-B., Chavanis, P.-H., Pichon, C., 2016, Physica A, 459, 117
Fouvry, J.-B., Pichon, C., Magorrian, J., Chavanis, P.-H., 2015, AA,
584, A129
Fouvry, J.-B., Bar-Or, B., 2018, MNRAS 481, 4566
Fouvry, J.-B., Bar-Or, B., Chavanis, P.-H., 2018, ApJ, in press
Fouvry, J.-B., Bar-Or, B., Chavanis, P.-H., 2018 Phys. Rev. E, in
press
Genzel, R., Pichon, C., Eckart, A., Gerhard, O.
E.,. 2000, MNRAS, 317, 348
Gilmore, G., & Reid, N. 1983, MNRAS, 202,
1025
Goldreich, P., & Lynden-Bell, D. 1965, MNRAS, 130, 125
Goldstein, H. 1950, Classical mechanics (Addison-Wesley)
Grand, R. J. J., Springel, V., Gómez, F. A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 459,
199
Hamilton, C., Fouvry, J.-B., Binney, J.,
Pichon, C., 2018, MNRAS, 481, 2041
Heggie, D., & Hut, P. 2003, The
Gravitational Million-Body Problem (CU Press)
Heggie, D.C., Breen, P.G., Varri, A.L.2019
MNRAS in press
Heyvaerts, J. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 355
Kaasalainen, M., & Binney, J. 1994, Phys. Rev. Lett., 73, 2377
Kalnajs, A. J. 1976, ApJ, 205, 745
Kimm, T., Cen, R., Devriendt, J., Dubois, Y.,
& Slyz, A. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 2900
Kocsis, B., & Tremaine, S. 2011, MNRAS,
412, 187
Landau, L. 1936, Phys. Z. Sowj. Union, 10, 154
Lenard, A. 1960, Annals of Physics, 10, 390
Lynden-Bell, D. 1967, MNRAS, 136, 101
Lynden-Bell, D., & Kalnajs, A. J. 1972, MNRAS, 157, 1
Merritt, D., Alexander, T., Mikkola, S., & Will, C. M. 2011, Phys.
Rev. D, 84, 044024
Meza, A., Navarro, J. F., Abadi, M. G., & Steinmetz, M. 2005,
MNRAS, 359, 93
Minchev, I., & Famaey, B. 2010, ApJ, 722,
112
Minchev, I., Famaey, B., Quillen, A. C., et al. 2012, A&A, 548,
A127
Monari, G., Famaey, B., & Siebert, A. 2016,
MNRAS, 457, 2569
Monari, G., Famaey, B., Fouvry, J.-B., Binney, J, 2017, MNRAS., 471,
4314
Moore, B. 1994, Nature, 370, 629
Murali, C. 1999, ApJ, 519, 580
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 1997, ApJ, 490,
493
Noguchi, M. 1998, Nature, 392, 253
Peirani, S., Kay, S., & Silk, J. 2008,
A&A, 479, 123
Pichon, C. 1994, Ph.D. thesis (University of
Cambridge)
Pichon, C., & Aubert, D. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 1657
Pichon, C., & Cannon, R. C. 1997, MNRAS, 291, 616
Pichon, C., Pogosyan, D., Kimm, T., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 2493
Rauch, K. P., & Tremaine, S. 1996, New A, 1, 149
Rozier, S., Fouvry, Breen, P., Varri,
Pichon, Heggie, 2019 MNRAS,
Sellwood, J. A. 1984, J. Comput. Phys., 50, 337
—. 2012, ApJ, 751, 44
Sellwood, J. A., & Carlberg, R. G. 2014, ApJ, 785, 137
Solway, M., Sellwood, J. A., & Schönrich, R. 2012, MNRAS, 422,
1363
Spitzer, Jr., L., & Schwarzschild, M. 1953, ApJ, 118, 106
Springel, V., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 2005, Nature, 440,
1137
Teyssier, R., Pontzen, A., Dubois, Y., &
Read, J. I. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 3068
Toomre, A. 1964, ApJ, 139, 1217
Toomre, A., & Toomre, J. 1972, ApJ, 178, 623
Toth, G., & Ostriker, J. P. 1992, ApJ, 389, 5
Tremaine, S., & Weinberg, M. D. 1984,
MNRAS, 209, 729
Varri, A.L et al., 2018 Computational
Astrophysics and Cosmology, 5, 2
Vasiliev, E., & Merritt, D. 2013, ApJ, 774, 87
Villalobos, Á., & Helmi, A. 2008, MNRAS,
391, 1806
Volonteri, M., Dubois, Y., Pichon, C., &
Devriendt, J. 2016, ArXiv, 1602.01941
Weinberg, M. D. 1989, MNRAS, 239, 549
—. 1991, ApJ, 368, 66
—. 1993, ApJ, 410, 543
—. 1998, MNRAS, 297, 101
—. 2001a, MNRAS, 328, 311
—. 2001b, MNRAS, 328, 321
Weinberg, M. D., & Katz, N. 2002, ApJ, 580, 627
1 In some sense, the last 70+ years theoretical effort in explaining secular evolution of galaxies has been partially misled, because the source of fluctuation was assumed to be local Keplerian deflections.
Externally driven secular evolution is addressed in the context of kinetic theory via the so-called Fokker-Planck collisionless diffusion equation, where the source of evolution are long distance potential fluctuations from an external bath. Binney+’88 computed these diffusion coefficients in action-space assuming correlated noise driven fluctuations in the gravitational potential. This first approach did not account for gravitational amplification. Weinberg’93 emphasised the importance of self-gravity for the non-local and collective relaxation of stellar systems, but for a somewhat contrived uniform equilibrium. Weinberg’01 considered the secular evolution of a stellar sphere in a bath while accounting for self-gravity. Pichon+’06 presented a time-decoupling approach to solve the collisionless Boltzmann equation in the presence of external perturbations and infall to quantify the fluctuating effects of dynamical flows on secular timescales.
Conversely, internally driven secular evolution is described via truncations of the BBGKY hierarchy, valid at order 1/N. While self-gravitating systems are spatially inhomogeneous, the first internally driven kinetic theories (Jeans’29) were also based on the assumption that close encounters between stars are treated with a local approximation, as if the system were infinite and homogeneous. Accounting for a large number of weak deflections, Chandrasekhar’49 developed an analogy with Brownian motion, relying on binary-collision theory. This led to the gravitational equivalent of Landau’s equation from plasmas, which does not account for long-range induced recurrences, nor collective effects (which increase effective gravitational masses and reduce collisional relaxation times). The kinetic theory of gravitating systems was recently generalised to fully inhomogeneous systems, either when collective effects are neglected (Chavanis’12) with the inhomogeneous Landau equation, or when they are accounted for, leading to the inhomogeneous Balescu-Lenard equation (Heyvaerts’10, Figure 1 below). These novel theories have now proven worthy in explaining secular processes on Galactic, Globular and nuclear cluster scales, illustrating the shortcomings of the local approximations.
2 e.g. the radial distribution of cosmic cold gas accretion directly impacts the metallicity of the new stars, which are the chemical clocks within the disc. This is a prime example of scale coupling that SEGAL will address.
3 Shadowing (Quinlan+’92), the fact that numerical shot noise statistically populates the relevant tori in phase space is of little help in this regime, unless it preserves orbits, since kinetic theory shows that resonances drive secular evolution in relaxed systems, as exemplified by the structure of the linear response operator.
4 Indeed, gravitational energy dominates on most scales. The impact of gas will be addressed here in setting up e.g. disc galaxies in low entropy states, as a drift in the mass of the components (following e.g. Pichon+’07), as a cold contribution to the gravitational susceptibility, and as extra sources of ‘external’ potential fluctuations (e.g. driven via AGN and stellar feedback see WPH below). Other baryonic processes relevant to galactic scales were investigated in the previous spin(e) ANR (which in particular showed that cooling led the gas to follow closely the dark-matter-imposed cosmic web). This stance restricts our analysis to the quieter lower redshift universe, where the acquisition of baryons can be treated perturbatively, or as an extra source of drift in the secular DF. Jointly with spin(e), SEGAL will allow us to quantify where and when secular processes dominate over environmentally driven ones.
5 The effect of general relativity is to induce a prograde pericenter shift, i.e. a shift of the orbit at the closest distance to the black hole. The warping of space-time due to frame dragging by a spinning black hole has a more subtle effect: a shift of the orbit at apocenter. Compared to a Schwarzschild black hole, the position of the apocenter of the orbit of the star S2 (which has a period of 16 years) around a maximum spinning black hole shifts by 10 μas, 24 μas et 40 μas, at the 1st, 2nd and 3rd orbit (Grould et al., 2017). A central goal of the proposal is to disentangle this relativistic effect from the Newtonian shift that an extended mass component would imply. Note that dozens of stellar mass black holes and invisible remnants are likely to perturb the trajectories of the S cluster. Their effect is partially degenerate with constrains on the relativistic effects of Sgr A*.